Alabama Court of Appeals April 16, 1929, 8 Div. 675. (Kirkland v. Neeley)

lead-opinion

The first and most urgent insistence made by appellant in his written argument is that the trial court committed error in overruling defendant's motion for a new trial on the ground that the verdict of the jury was contrary to the weight of the evidence. He cites no authority to sustain his contention, and admits that the evidence on every point is in conflict.