Ohio Court of Appeals November 22, 1929 (Braunlin v. Doty)

MAUCK, J.

It will be observed that the defendants do not plead that the plaintiff had any knowledge of any defense that the maker had to the note purchased by the plaintiff nor that he had any notice that there had been any failure of title to the lands sold. The averment only charges that the plaintiff had knowledge of the sale of the land and that the mortgage was given for the purchase money.