Supreme Court of North Carolina March 12, 1930 (Sorrell v. . Sorrell)

BeogdbN, J.

The defendant asserts that the plaintiff is not entitled to recover for the reason that the evidence discloses that the plaintiff is attempting to engraft a parol trust upon an absolute deed in favor of the grantor, and relies upon

Gaylord v. Gaylord,

150 N. C., 222, 63 S. E., 1028;

Tire Co. v. Lester,

192 N. C., 642, 135 S. E., 778;

Waddell v. Aycock,

195 N. C., 268, 142 S. E., 10.