Ohio Court of Appeals December 11, 1931, No 83 (Karn v. Peoples Savings Bank)

lead-opinion

BY THE COURT

The sole question therefore, is whether there is error in the record in the ruling out of the testimony proposed to be offered on behalf of Karn or whether there is sufficient in the location and appearance of the signatures upon the note to justify the inference or make competent the evidence offered on behalf of Karn, that the said Karn signed as agent of the principal