Ohio Court of Appeals October 13, 1933, No 664 (Rothgery v. Seaton)
Also known as
United States · · · 13-10-1933
*189OPINION
PER CURIAM
A very simple case was presented. If plaintiff was not guilty of contributory negligence, he was entitled to recover against the defendant if the defendant’s negligence was a contributing proximate cause of said collision, even though the negligence of the driver of the car in which plaintiff was riding was also,a contributing proximate cause of said collision.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit