Ohio Court of Appeals December 19, 1935, Nos 343 & 345 (Messinger v. Karg)

OPINION

By STEVENS, J.

We have examined the several grounds of error urged by plaintiff in error, and in each case we find them to be without substantial merit.

The most bitter complaint of plaintiff in error has to do with the admission into evidence of the testimony of the witnesses Moloney and Sherman, with reference to statements allegedly made by plaintiff in error to defendants in error on