Wisconsin Supreme Court June 24, 1935 (State v. Jackson)

Neeson, J.

The contentions of the defendant which we deem sufficiently important to merit consideration may be summarized as follows:

(1) The court erred in overruling his demurrer to the information; (2) the court erred in not requiring the state to elect upon which count it would try the defendant; (3) the court erred in admitting evidence of other sales of *17liquor by the defendant to Dick