Michigan Supreme Court January 31, 1936, Docket No. 102, Calendar No. 38,619. (Lakeside Resort Corp. v. Sprague)

Bushnell, J.

The parties agree that only one question is involved. It may he stated as follows: Should the trial court have held as a matter of law that the so-called amusement .park equipment, listed in plaintiff’s affidavit for a writ of replevin, was real estate ?

The disputed matters were submitted to a jury; plaintiff had a verdict for the return of the property and six.