Supreme Court of North Carolina December 16, 1936 (Parrish v. Boysell Manufacturing Co.)

Stacy, C. J.,

after stating the case: Two questions are presented by the appeal of the corporate defendant.

1. "Was Elaine Tucker acting within the course of her employment or the scope of her authority as an employee of the defendant company in searching the plaintiff? The answer is, “No.”

Lamm v. Charles Stores Co.,

201 N. C., 134, 159 S. E., 444;

Daniel v. R. R.,

136 N. C., 517, 48 S. E., 816.