Supreme Court of North Carolina September 23, 1936 (Dozier v. . Ballance)

Per Curiam.

We do not think any of the exceptions and assignments of error made by defendant can be sustained. The major contest was over whether the note when executed by defendant was not under seal, and therefore barred by the three-year statute of limitations. The testimony on this aspect was competent, but conflicting. Plaintiff testified it was and defendant to the contrary.