District Court, N.D. New York September 19, 1939, No. 220 (Fischback v. Solvay Process Co.)
Also known as
United States · · · 19-09-1939
BRYANT, District Judge.
The motion for bill of particulars, now under consideration, must be limited to information necessary to enable defendant to prepare its answer. Tully v. Howard et. al., D.C., 27 F.Supp. 6.
I have attempted to determine the particulars, not set forth in the complaint, which defendant requires for that purpose.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit