Superior Court of Pennsylvania November 10, 1947, Appeal, 23 (Commonwealth Ex Rel. Pinkenson v. Pinkenson)
Also known as
United States · · · 10-11-1947
Opinion by
Hirt, J.,
In this proceeding, the wife’s petition for an order on her husband for support was dismissed by the lower court, but only after serious consideration of all of the testimony. A judge who sees and hears the witnesses in a case such as this is in better position than we to decide the issue on its merits
(Com. ex rel. v. Wm. Goldstein,
105 Pa. Superior Ct. 194, 160 A.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit