Wisconsin Supreme Court February 7, 1950 (City Lumber & Supply Co. v. Fisher)

*404

Broadfoot, J.

The facts in this case are not in dispute. The appellants raise a question of law. They

contend that

the lien given to a contractor or materialman is like a mortgage and that the judgment should contain a provision for the same period of redemption as is provided in the foreclosure of mortgages. To sustain this contention they first cite the case of

Dean v. Pyncheon,

3 Pin. 17.