Supreme Court of Georgia September 10, 1951, No. 17524 (Smith v. Smith)
Also known as
United States · · · 10-09-1951
Atkinson, Presiding Justice.
(After stating the foregoing facts). The controlling question here is whether the grantor in the bond for title had the right to rescind the contract and resell the property when the notes given for the purchase price had become due and unpaid.
The considerations of the bond here in question were: If the grantee “shall . .
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit