Wisconsin Supreme Court June 3, 1952 (Rietbrock v. Studds)
Also known as
United States · · · 03-06-1952
Gehl,
].
Defendant contends that the note and agreement, construed as one instrument, are void as an agreement to circumvent the bankruptcy laws. His attack is directed against the provision of paragraph 6, that defendant will not in the event of bankruptcy proceedings list the note as a dischargeable debt.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit