California Court of Appeal February 16, 1954, Civ. 15621 (Hartman v. Rizzuto)

*187

WOOD (Fred B.), J.

The principal question upon this appeal is whether or not a rear yard requirement of a municipal zoning ordinance continues operative and makes the land affected not “marketable” or not “free and clear of all incumbrances,” under the circumstances of this case.

Plaintiff and cross-defendant R. H.