Supreme Court of North Carolina September 21, 1955 (State ex rel. Wilson v. Pearson)
Also known as
United States · · · 21-09-1955
Per Curiam.
On appeal to this Court from an order entered in the court below on a motion to strike allegations contained in the pleadings, the appellant must show prejudicial error. Hinson v. Britt, 232 N.C. 379, 61 S.E. 2d 185; Woody v. Barnett, 235 N.C. 73, 68 S.E. 2d 810.
The complaint contains a prolix statement of evidentiary facts which were stricken by the court below.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit