District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania November 28, 1955, Civ. A. No. 19538 (Lavdas v. Holland)

KIRKPATRICK, Chief Judge.

(1) I think that the rationale of the decision of the Supreme Court in Shaughnessy v. Pedreiro, 349 U.S. 48, 75 S.Ct. 591, 98 L.Ed. 868, leads, in this case, to the conclusion that neither the Commissioner of Immigration and Naturalization nor the Attorney General is an indispensable party in a proceeding of this nature and that the petition for a judicial review and