Supreme Court of North Carolina March 21, 1956 (Davis v. Blankenship)
Also known as
United States · · · 21-03-1956
PeR CuRiam.
A careful consideration of the exceptions and assignments of error brought forward and discussed in the appellants’ brief leads us to the conclusion that no error sufficiently prejudicial to justify a new trial has been shown. Hence, in the trial below we find
No error.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit