Alabama Court of Appeals May 24, 1960, 5 Div. 579 (Bailey v. State)
Also known as
United States · · · 24-05-1960
In the third paragraph above, we said the testimony of Mr. Godwin would support an inference that the appellant was an aggressor. Appellant's counsel, on rehearing, correctly points out that Mr. Godwin's testimony on that point came in by way of rebuttal.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit