Supreme Court of North Carolina December 19, 1963 (State v. Perry)
Also known as
United States · · · 19-12-1963
Per Curiam.
The defendant contends that the State’s evidence was insufficient -to sustain the verdicts rendered below, and that his motion for judgment las of nonsuit made at the close of all the evidence should have been sustained.
The defendant relies upon the fact that the State used his conf ession as made to a police officer in Burlington, North Carolina.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit