Wisconsin Supreme Court April 2, 1963 (Hurst v. Hungerford)
Also known as
United States · · · 02-04-1963
Currie, J.
Upon oral argument plaintiff’s counsel raised a point not mentioned in the briefs. This is that the order for new trial was entered more than sixty days after return of the verdict without any order having been entered extending the time within which the circuit court might decide the motions after verdict.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit