Ohio Supreme Court June 26, 1963, D. D. No. 44 (Columbus Bar Ass'n v. Potts)

Per Curiam.

The respondent objects to the conclusions of law of the Board of Commissioners on Grievances and Discipline on the ground that the evidence does not warrant the following conclusions:

1. Respondent assented to such “solicitation.”

2. The union was “constantly soliciting” FELA claims for respondent and O’Donnell & Schwartz.

3. There was “solicitation.”

4.