Court of Appeals of Maryland November 20, 1964, [No. 55, September Term, 1964.] (Sisk v. State)

Prescott, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This is appellant’s second attempt to offset his conviction of obtaining money by false pretenses under Code (1957), Article 27, Section 140. In his first appeal,

Sisk v. State,

232 Md. 155, we held that the Regiscope photograph, which convicted him, had not been properly authenticated, and remanded for a new trial.

Although State’s Exhibit No.