New York Supreme Court January 31, 1964 (Washington Heights Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. 685A Hancock Street Corp.)

Charles J. Beckinella, J.

This memorandum is a statement of the reason why this court has not granted an ex parte application for an “ order amending notice of pendency of action ”.

*912Plaintiff’s attorney urges that an amended notice of pendency is required to be filed in this action because of the language of section 6512 of the Civil Practice Law and Buies.