Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court April 13, 1964 (Holmes v. Fitchburg & Leominster Street Railway Co.)
Also known as
United States · · · 13-04-1964
Spalding, J.
In this action of tort, in which the plaintiff Lillian Holmes (hereinafter called the plaintiff) had a verdict, several procedural questions have arisen.1 Since our answers to these questions are decisive of the case we do not reach the merits. There are also before us exceptions arising out of a petition to vacate judgment.
The First Case.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit