Supreme Court of North Carolina March 4, 1964 (Falls ex rel. Falls v. Williams)

Per Curiam.

A careful examination of the evidence convinces us the case should have been submitted to the jury on appropriate issues. How the conflicts in the testimony should be resolved is a matter for the jury — not the court. A detailed discussion of the evidence presently be*414fore us is not appropriate. Sprueill v. Hamlet, 260, N.C. 546, 133 S.E. 2d 173.

New trial.