Ohio Supreme Court April 21, 1965, No. 38633 (Lake v. Buckeye Steel Castings Co.)

SchNeider, J.

Buckeye contends that it had the right to refuse the demand of Lake for two reasons: (1) Lake’s written demand does not contain a specific purpose and (2) Lake had the burden of showing that his written request for the names, addresses and number of shares held, of the other shareholders “with whom * * * [he might] desire to communicate regarding the affairs of the corporation,” is