Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit May 11, 1966, Nos. 241-243, Dockets 30034-30036 (Asheville Mica Co. v. Commodity Credit Corp.)

PER CURIAM: .

This Court is no stranger to these actions. On a previous appeal,1 we reversed and remanded, holding that the district judge2 erred in declining to apply the parol evidence rule and in failing to look to extrinsic evidence as an aid in interpreting the ambiguous price escalation clause 3 appearing in identical contracts between the Commodity Credit Corporation (CCC) and each of the