Court of Appeals of Maryland May 9, 1968, [No. 202, September Term, 1968.] (Brooks v. Fairman)

McWilliams, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

To borrow an expression from the jargon of the negligence specialists the appellee (Fairman) was “rear-ended” by the appellant (Brooks). Brooks complains that the verdict of the jury, $10,000, was unduly inflated by the admission of a doctor’s bill not shown to be either necessary or reasonable.