Connecticut Appellate Court November 15, 1968, File No. CR 6-45616 (State v. Dimeo)

Dearington, J.

The defendant, having been convicted of the erime of theft of goods exposed for sale, has appealed, assigning error in the court’s *215conclusion that upon all the evidence he was guilty of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt and in the court’s holding that it was the obligation of the defendant to produce a witness claimed by the defendant to be material to the issues.