Court of Appeals of Georgia February 4, 1969, 44088 (Architectural Manufacturing Co. v. Airotec, Inc.)

Deen, Judge.

1. Construing the evidence as we must against the motion for directed verdict the following must be considered. In the opinion of Biron, what Airolite wanted was an organization that could compete with its main competitor in the already established louver and manufacturing field, which competitor had an architectural specialties division, which Airolite lacked.