Wisconsin Supreme Court November 28, 1972, State 107 (State v. Elkinton)

Also known as

United States · · · 28-11-1972

Robert W. Hansen, J.

The defendant contends, and the trial court agreed, that granting the defense motion

*500

for a mistrial precluded the state from proceeding in a new trial on the same charge. This would make the granting of a motion for mistrial in a criminal case the exact equivalent, in its implications and consequences, of an acquittal. That is not the law, and never has been.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.