Court of Appeals for the First Circuit January 29, 1975, 75--1009 (In Re Lionel Mintzer)

PER CURIAM.

The appellant is a recalcitrant witness who, though granted “use immunity”, refused to testify when called before the grand jury on the ground that the questions to be propounded were the product of an unlawful wiretap. The district court examined the wiretap that the government asserted was the sole basis for the questions, E.B.D. 71-98, and found it to be lawful.