Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit August 20, 1975, 75-1429 (United States v. Frank Vincent Okiyama)

OPINION

PER CURIAM:

Okiyama appeals from his conviction for narcotics offenses (21 U.S.C. §§ 952, 841), contending that the district court erred in denying his pretrial motion to dismiss the indictment on the ground that the grand and petit juries had not been selected in substantial compliance with applicable statutory provisions (28 U.S.C. §§ 1864, 1865, 1866, 1867).