Court of Appeals of Maryland February 7, 1977, [No. 50, September Term, 1976.] (Beahm v. Shortall)

Orth, J.,

delivered the opinion of the Court.

This appeal requires that we look again at the rule followed in this jurisdiction concerning the admissibility of the testimony of a physician employed to examine a person, not for the purpose of treatment, but in order to qualify as an expert witness during litigation.