Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit March 23, 1977, 75-3688 (Arthur N. Stephenson v. National Labor Relations Board)
Also known as
United States · · · 23-03-1977
KUNZIG, Judge,*
dissenting:
I respectfully dissent from the conclusion of the majority. Despite oral argument by Government counsel which was of little or no assistance in this important matter, I am persuaded that the decision here should be in favor of the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB).
The majority places its reliance on Ban-yard v. NLRB, 164 U.S.App.D.C. 235, 505 F.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit