Court of Appeals of North Carolina August 29, 1978, 775SC795 (Blake v. Norman)

Also known as

United States · · · 29-08-1978

CLARK, Judge.

Defendants’ plea that the

Batson

and

Cutts

cases are

res judicata

and a bar to plaintiffs’ claim requires an examination of these cases, which were introduced in evidence at the hearing on defendants’ plea. See

Batson v. Bell,

249 N.C. 718, 107 S.E. 2d 562 (1959), and

Cutts v. Casey,

271 N.C. 165, 155 S.E. 2d 519 (1967); 275 N.C. 599, 170 S.E. 2d 598 (1969); and 278 N.C. 390, 180 S.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.