Court of Appeals of North Carolina August 29, 1978, 775SC795 (Blake v. Norman)
Also known as
United States · · · 29-08-1978
CLARK, Judge.
Defendants’ plea that the
Batson
and
Cutts
cases are
res judicata
and a bar to plaintiffs’ claim requires an examination of these cases, which were introduced in evidence at the hearing on defendants’ plea. See
Batson v. Bell,
249 N.C. 718, 107 S.E. 2d 562 (1959), and
Cutts v. Casey,
271 N.C. 165, 155 S.E. 2d 519 (1967); 275 N.C. 599, 170 S.E. 2d 598 (1969); and 278 N.C. 390, 180 S.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit