Idaho Supreme Court June 30, 1978, 12078 (Just's, Inc. v. Arrington Construction Co.)
Also known as
United States · · · 30-06-1978
DONALDSON, Justice,
dissenting.
I am unable to agree with the conclusion reached in Parts I through III of the majority opinion and consequently dissent therefrom.
The majority concludes that the “plaintiff is a member of the class of third persons intended to be benefitted by this contract and is entitled to sue for its breach.” Ante, p. 1002. With this I cannot agree.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit