Idaho Supreme Court June 30, 1978, 12078 (Just's, Inc. v. Arrington Construction Co.)

Also known as

United States · · · 30-06-1978

DONALDSON, Justice,

dissenting.

I am unable to agree with the conclusion reached in Parts I through III of the majority opinion and consequently dissent therefrom.

The majority concludes that the “plaintiff is a member of the class of third persons intended to be benefitted by this contract and is entitled to sue for its breach.” Ante, p. 1002. With this I cannot agree.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.