Superior Court of Pennsylvania August 31, 1979, 2048, 2049 and 2050 (Saks v. Jeanes Hospital)

PER CURIAM:

Since this case arose before the effective date of Pa.R.Civ.P., No. 4019(i), it was within the discretion of the trial judge to permit the expert witness to testify despite the fact that appellee had not included the witness’s name in its answer to an interrogatory propounded by appellants.

See Nissley v. Pennsylvania R.R. Co.,

435 Pa. 503, 259 A.2d 451 (1969);

Moore

v.

Howard P.