Ohio Court of Appeals May 28, 1980, 5160 (Keatley v. United National Bank & Trust Co.)
Also known as
United States · · · 28-05-1980
Dowd, J.,
concurring. In my view, the well-written and reasoned dissent of Judge Rutherford on the merits of the appeal serves to highlight the position that Judge Putman and I have taken with respect to the requirement, as we view it, to file timely objections to the referee’s report with the trial court to preserve the same for appellate review.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit