Ohio Supreme Court May 28, 1980, D.D. No. 80-5 (Lake County Bar Ass'n v. Gargiulo)

Per Curiam.

The evidence indicates that respondent did not benefit financially from the transactions that serve as the basis of this disciplinary action. Further, it appears that respondent acted neither maliciously nor for gain. Yet, respondent was involved in an obvious conflict of interest situation and there are indications of overreaching in these transactions.