Supreme Court of North Carolina January 27, 1981, 86 (State v. Elam)
Also known as
United States · · · 27-01-1981
HUSKINS, Justice.
Defendant, for the first time in the Court of Appeals, argued that G.S. 14-202.1 is unconstitutional. The constitutionality of the statute was not raised in the trial court, and the Court of Appeals therefore declined to discuss the merits of the constitutional arguments, citing
State v. Cumber,
280 N.C. 127, 185 S.E.2d 141 (1971), and
Bland v. City of Wilmington,
278 N.C.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit