Supreme Court of North Carolina January 27, 1981, 86 (State v. Elam)

Also known as

United States · · · 27-01-1981

HUSKINS, Justice.

Defendant, for the first time in the Court of Appeals, argued that G.S. 14-202.1 is unconstitutional. The constitutionality of the statute was not raised in the trial court, and the Court of Appeals therefore declined to discuss the merits of the constitutional arguments, citing

State v. Cumber,

280 N.C. 127, 185 S.E.2d 141 (1971), and

Bland v. City of Wilmington,

278 N.C.

Read the full text

This document is published by courtlistener.com.

Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.