District Court, N.D. Ohio May 6, 1981, Civ. A. C80-2337 (Rahal v. Crestmont Cadillac Corp.)

ORDER

CONTIE, District Judge.

Pending before the Court in the above captioned case are cross motions for summary judgment. The defendant Crestmont Cadillac Corporation (Cadillac) asserts that it is entitled to summary judgment on the basis that as a matter of law the plaintiff has not suffered any injury for the antitrust violations alleged within his complaint.