Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York June 1, 1981 (In re Prince)

OPINION OF THE COURT

Per Curiam.

The respondent was admitted to practice by this court on April 27, 1938, under the name of Clarence J. Prince.

The respondent was charged with the following allegations of misconduct:

*62Charge One: The respondent was guilty of conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit and a gross conflict of interest in that, after he was retained to stop the sale of a house by