Court of Appeals of Oregon August 10, 1981, No. 2-2401-OZF453-3-0, CA 19377 (Chaddick v. Adult & Family Services Division)

VAN HOOMISSEN, J.

Petitioner appeals from an order of the Adult and Family Services Division (AFSD) denying her benefits. There is no dispute concerning the relevant facts. The only issue is whether petitioner was entitled to receive benefits for herself and one child for the month of April, 1980. We find that she was and therefore reverse.