Court of Appeals of North Carolina March 16, 1982, 8129SC337 (Arrington v. Brad Ragan, Inc.)
Also known as
United States · · · 16-03-1982
WEBB, Judge.
If, on the evidence, the plaintiff could recover either for breach of warranty or negligence, the motion for dismissal was improperly allowed. There was an implied warranty by the original defendant that the stove would heat the plaintiffs’ home without exploding.
See
G.S. 25-2-315. We believe the principles applying to the facts of this case are found in
Insurance Co. v.
Read the full text
This document is published by courtlistener.com.
Moonlit adds the citation network, article-level links and cross-references, which are available to search for free.
Sign in to Moonlit