Ohio Supreme Court June 30, 1982, D.D. No. 82-19 (Bar Ass'n v. Bendis)

Per Curiam.

As he did throughout his criminal trial in *283Kansas, respondent steadfastly denies any knowledge of the scheme to obtain the money order by fraudulent means. However, both fraud and conspiracy to defraud, as well as the element of knowledge, were established at the Kansas trial.