District Court of Appeal of Florida May 6, 1982, No. AE-371 (Jack E. Merklein, Inc. v. Hohl)

PER CURIAM.

Merklein, Inc. argues that the deputy commissioner erred in awarding claimant rehabilitation benefits pursuant to Sections 440.15(2)(b) and 440.49(1), Fla.Stat. (1977), arguing that because the rehabilitation counselor did not recommend a course of instruction for rehabilitative purposes, there was no evidence from which the deputy could conclude that such benefits should be awarded.