Nevada Supreme Court December 29, 1982, No. 11294 (Washington v. State)

OPINION

Per Curiam:

After a jury found appellant guilty of robbery, he moved for a new trial. The district court denied appellant’s motion, concluding that NRS 176.515 does not permit a new trial to be granted for insufficiency of the evidence. On appeal, appellant contends, to the contrary, that the court possessed lawful authority to consider his motion. We agree.